Over the weekend one thing is getting clear about the Telengana agitation, intentions of it's ideological philosopher and his political followers. From what is said about him all these days, Jayashankar commanded respect across the various sections of the society, including those who opposed Telangana
But today, his allegation on NT Ramarao that he was the stumbling block for Telangana shows this Prof's ignorance and perhaps arrogance of the time. When it comes to Andhra Pradesh or working for the good causes of Telugu people, NT Ramarao is the tallest person. He did enormous service by giving an identity to the Telugu's. Until then, our Prof would have known that including his Telangana all were madrasis. NTR was no doubt for unified Andhra Pradesh. That is a fact. But, during his political life time there was no wishper about the seperate Telengana. Then, on what basis such an remark could be made on a person who is no more amongst us people. Needless to say this sort of advise on various occasions KCR took from Prof Jayashankar, went on speaking irresponsibly and wrote his political obituiry.
All these Goud's, Reddy's or Rao's who now talking irresponsibily are nothing infront of NT Ramarao during his political times. As a matter of fact both K Chandra Sekhar Rao and Davender Goud would not have any political identity with out Nadamuri Taraka Ramarao. Ironically, Goud on the day he left Telugu Desam Party - said all his political life is because of NTR. KCR now completely isolated, named his son - after NTR. How come these two people let their idealogist to speak irresponsbily? This is nothing more than opportunitist politics. You may leave a party on idealogical reasons. But abetting such statements on a person who gave political life is a mark on their integrity.
Prof Jayashankar says that Goud has been thinking of Telangana for about ten years (if some fool is ready to listen, he may say Goud started thinking when he was born!). Telenaga -II (1970's agitation might be called Telanaga -I), did not come into being until 2004 with the emegence of maveric KCR. Let's accept that Goud is correct for a while - in that scenario why Prof Jayashankar went with KCR? Now ditching him for Goud? So, Prof got a plan B for sometime. All in all it obvious that - Prof Jayashankar is not a honest person. Now that irrepairable damage is done to TRS and KCR, he is shifting to Davendar Goud.
But today, his allegation on NT Ramarao that he was the stumbling block for Telangana shows this Prof's ignorance and perhaps arrogance of the time. When it comes to Andhra Pradesh or working for the good causes of Telugu people, NT Ramarao is the tallest person. He did enormous service by giving an identity to the Telugu's. Until then, our Prof would have known that including his Telangana all were madrasis. NTR was no doubt for unified Andhra Pradesh. That is a fact. But, during his political life time there was no wishper about the seperate Telengana. Then, on what basis such an remark could be made on a person who is no more amongst us people. Needless to say this sort of advise on various occasions KCR took from Prof Jayashankar, went on speaking irresponsibly and wrote his political obituiry.
All these Goud's, Reddy's or Rao's who now talking irresponsibily are nothing infront of NT Ramarao during his political times. As a matter of fact both K Chandra Sekhar Rao and Davender Goud would not have any political identity with out Nadamuri Taraka Ramarao. Ironically, Goud on the day he left Telugu Desam Party - said all his political life is because of NTR. KCR now completely isolated, named his son - after NTR. How come these two people let their idealogist to speak irresponsbily? This is nothing more than opportunitist politics. You may leave a party on idealogical reasons. But abetting such statements on a person who gave political life is a mark on their integrity.
Prof Jayashankar says that Goud has been thinking of Telangana for about ten years (if some fool is ready to listen, he may say Goud started thinking when he was born!). Telenaga -II (1970's agitation might be called Telanaga -I), did not come into being until 2004 with the emegence of maveric KCR. Let's accept that Goud is correct for a while - in that scenario why Prof Jayashankar went with KCR? Now ditching him for Goud? So, Prof got a plan B for sometime. All in all it obvious that - Prof Jayashankar is not a honest person. Now that irrepairable damage is done to TRS and KCR, he is shifting to Davendar Goud.
Is there a Plan C? When Chiranjeevi enters the political scene, the euphoria around Davender Goud will disappear. I am sure Prof is already working on the Plan C that he would reveal when he ditch Davender Goud
It is clear that it is Prof Jayashankar who screwed TRS and KCR. If he speaks more and advises the political leaders like he did, he may end up screwing the main cause.
It is clear that it is Prof Jayashankar who screwed TRS and KCR. If he speaks more and advises the political leaders like he did, he may end up screwing the main cause.
28th June 2008
----------------
No comments:
Post a Comment